OK, So. The Top Picture Might Be A Reference To An Old Religious Statue That Was Made Because Of A "divine

I'm just wondering if the color theory section for red doesn't include that it looks like blood

Skeptic lovers rise uppppp ughhh

Back on my heroquiet BULLSHITTTTT

I like the idea of giving every voice their princesess crown

The Voices .

(Like, all of them)

They are birds, but actually not really because they have other animal inspired featuresBUT THEN AGAIN WHAT IS ANYTHING OF THE LONG QUIET?

All of them get the crowns of their respective Chapter I princess's. The tiaras change depending on the princess, no context, no matter that they haven't seen the princess yet(is always more of a symbolic representation, some even mold them out of the path)

I imagine this dust feathers post-construct all got bodies because TLQ did them all by memory and yanked them from the Princess's hearts where they still stayed (in a part of the Shifting Mound still whiting her) or smth close to that. But when they actually became "real" they where put in a separate world entirely, itty-bitty tree house and everything for them.

*Bonus terrible size reference:

This is a dangerous train of thought to me mainly because of Two reasons:

1. "canon is only a suggestion" I get what he's trying to say here but if you are writing a character with an already established personality OF COURSE IT MAKES SENSE TO EXPECT THEM TO BEHAVE LIKE IN CANNON.

Obviously there is room for interpretation but there's a difference between interpretation and writing an entirely new character and claiming they are one from canon (for example imagine I make a stp fic where contra is super serious and follows every order he's given and thinks he's the best of the voices)

2. "You don’t get to stick your nose in their world and tell them “hey this is not to my liking therefore I think you’re doing it wrong” when you can simply leave quietly and move on to something else you may enjoy"

This is making some rather dangerous claims like saying that commenting on a piece of art that someone posted PUBLICALLY is "sticking your nose into their world".

That every disagreement or critique made towards a work of art is meant to be an attack to the objective value of the whole thing (assuming there's something such as "objectively good or bad things")

And that just because you can decide not to consume something you have no right to express any kind of criticsm towards it.

To me this whole post just reads as overly defensive and feeling like "overly attatched" to something you made to the point where every kind of criticsm towards it feels like a personal attack to you.

unless they specifically asked, you don’t get to tell a fanfic writer you think they mischaracterized the character by the way. because the second someone writes a fanfic about a character, that character becomes the writer’s own version of the character. canon is only a suggestion, but whether or not an author will follow it / how much of canon an author will take is entirely up to them. you don’t get to stick your nose in their world and tell them “hey this is not to my liking therefore I think you’re doing it wrong” when you can simply leave quietly and move on to something else you may enjoy

did someone say… CONTRARIAN REDRAW?!

Crickets…

…no? Alright I’ll take my leave 😔

I do not care how many enemies I make with this afformation.

The only people Who like opportunist are people Who change his personality to make him care for others

wich

defeats

the

whole

f*uking

point

of

him

being

THE

OPPORTUNIST

What people think enemies to lovers smitten looks like:

Smitten x thorn

What It would actually look like:

Smitten x narrator

Thank you Princess

She deserves her own wings, god I need a bird Princess wait hold on I CAN MAKE ONE