they actually looked so cute here lmao
Thinking cruel, nasty, disgusting thoughts does not make you a cruel, nasty, disgusting person.
Writing cruel, nasty, disgusting fiction does not make you a cruel, nasty, disgusting person.
Only taking cruel, nasty, disgusting actions against a real person makes you a cruel, nasty, disgusting person.
Thinking warm, caring, generous thoughts does not make you a warm, caring, generous person.
Writing warm, caring, generous fiction does not make you a warm, caring, generous person.
Only taking warm, caring, generous actions for benefit of a real person makes you a warm, caring, generous person.
cw vent
I find it so so disrespectful how as soon as someone makes sexy fanarts of a fictional character who's a sa victim, antis come to harass them like "sexualizing sa victims is disgusting and wrong and we're right to harass you for it" and even go as far as to edit their art to completely cover the character in clothes until we can't see an inch of skin.
I'm not going to sugarcoat it: as a sex-positive rape survivor, go fuck yourself antis who insinuate that ALL victims must absolutely become sex-negative and aren't allowed to be sexy anymore to be a "valid victim"
"Valid victimhood" is the stupidest thing to come out of all this discourse. All victims are valid. It doesn't matter if they're sex negative or sex positive. It doesn't matter how they present themselves. It doesn't matter what they believe in. There's no such thing as an invalid victim.
I used to be a noobshipper and I’ve finally evolved into a proshipper. I aspire to be a hackershipper, maybe one day I’ll even be a godshipper!!!
Her soul might be tar but her heart is made of gold
Uh- are you aware of the meaning of proship?
Proship has never meant anything except a combination of three ideas:
Ship and let ship (your ships don't harm me and vice-versa) and YKINMK (your kink is not my kink, and that's okay; my kink stories don't harm you and vice-versa)
Harassment over fiction is not acceptable
Censorship of fiction is not acceptable either
Any other definitions are made by antis, not proshippers, and are an attempt at revisionism to justify harassment based on false claims.
people need to stop treating fictional characters like they're real people
it's so annoying
"simping over this character is objectifying them!!!" THEYRE LITERALLY OBJECTS. THEY DONT EXSIT. THEY CANT BE OFFENDED, MADE UNCOMFORTABLE, ETC, BECAUSE THEY DONT EXIST.
“you can write non-con and dark fics as long as you’re not romanticizing it”
“you can write non-con and dark fics as long as it’s your way of coping with your trauma”
“you can write non-con and dark fics as long as —”
actually, anybody — including you — can write non-con and dark fics, and any other fucked up things, however they want, for whatever reasons.
wanna romanticize the fuck out of your non-con / dead dove do not eat fic? go ahead. don’t let anybody stop you from creating the art you want to create.
wanna write non-con fic even if you were never a victim? go ahead. you don’t have to meet any specific criteria in order to create the art you want to create.
just tag your works properly so that you don’t accidentally expose those who might not want to be exposed to such topics to the topics, and you’re all good.
art does not have to be for everybody.
art has never been strictly about rainbow and sunshine. art can also be about the horror and the macabre.
art can be outright disgusting and messed up, and being disgusting and messed up can be just what makes the art a masterpiece.
I would imagine that even if she had him isolated in the demon realm, it wouldn’t be enough to satisfy her forever and she would eventually grow insecure again. Maybe she would have a vision of Andy running away or killing himself and the only solution she can think of is the restrict him further.
Just as he thinks that he can bear his feelings of unhappiness she would start ramping it up but it would be too late to escape.
Wow I love thinking about mental torment!