Your personal Tumblr journey starts here
Fuck Ai Art - Blog Posts
Few of the artist affected by AI art thievery.
Posts by Jon Lam Art.
AI disturbance overlays for those who don't have Ibis paint premium. found them on tiktok
Good news, fellow artists! Nightshade has finally been released by the UChicago team! If you aren't aware of what Nightshade is, it's a tool that helps poison AI datasets so that the model "sees" something different from what an image actually depicts. It's the same team that released Glaze, which helps protect art against style mimicry (aka those finetuned models that try to rip off a specific artist). As they show in their paper, even a hundred poisoned concepts make a huge difference.
(Reminder that glazing your art is more important than nighshading it, as they mention in their tweets above, so when you're uploading your art, try to glaze it at the very least.)
I just had to say something about being against AI art even for a cover art of the magazine that the specialized educational facility will publish with their students, I thought even tho most of the people might not understand their art, it'd be still way much more better than AI magazine cover.
So my cousin (one of the teachers from there) just pulled the "then draw bitch u can perfectly draw better than us" card and I said "ok😡" so goodbye to my bnha x batfam and taof fanart drawing for a little bit more time🙂🙂
I've finally figured out an argument that convinces coding tech-bros that AI art is bad.
Got into a discussion today (actually a discussion, we were both very reasonable and calm even through I felt like committing violence) with a tech-bro-coded lady who claimed that people use AI in coding all the time so she didn't see why it mattered if people used AI in art.
Obviously I repressed the surge of violence because that would accomplish nothing. Plus, this lady is very articulate, the type who makes claims and you sit there thinking no that's wrong it must be but she said it so well you're kind of just waffling going but, no, wait-- so I knew I had to get this right if I was gonna come out of this unscathed.
The usual arguments about it being about the soul of it and creation fell flat, in fact she was adamant that anyone who believed that was in fact looking down at coding as an art form as she insisted it is. Which, sure, you can totally express yourself through coding. There's a lot more nuance as to the differences but clearly I was not going to win this one.
The other people I was with (literally 8 people anti-ai against her, but you can't change the mind of someone who doesn't want to listen and she just kept accusing us of devaluing coding as an art) took over for I kid you not 15 minutes while I tried desperately to come up with a clear and articulate way to explain the difference to her. They tried so many reasonable arguments, coding being for a function ("what, art doesn't serve a function?") coding being many discrete building blocks that you put together differently, and the AI simply provides the blocks and you put it together yourself ("isn't that what prompt building is") that it's bad for the environment ("but not if it's used for capitalism, hm?" "Yeah literally that's how capitalism works it doesn't care about the environment" she didn't like that response)
But I finally got it.
And the answer is: It's not about what you do, it's about what you claim to be.
Imagine that someone asks an AI to write a code and, by some miracle, it works perfectly without them having to tweak it---which is great because they couldn't tell you what a single solitary thing in that code means.
Now imagine this person, with their code that they don't know how it works, goes and applies to be a coder somewhere, presenting this AI code as proof that they're qualified.
Should they be hired?
She was horrified, of course. Of course they shouldn't be. They're not qualified. They can't actually code, and even if by some miracle they did have an AI successfully write a flawless code for every issue they came across that wouldn't be their code, you could hire any shmuck on the street to do that, no reason to pay someone like they're creating something.
When actual engineers use AI what they do is get some kind of base, which they then go though and check for problems and then if they find any they fix them, and add on to the base code with their own knowledge instead of just trying different prompt after prompt until they randomly come across one that works.
People who generate code like this don't usually call themselves engineers. They're people who needed a bit of code and didn't have the knowledge to generate it, and so used a resource.
And there you go. There are people who have none of the skills of artists, they don't practice, they don't create for themselves. When they feed the prompt to the AI they then don't just use the resulting image as a reference point for their own personal masterpiece, and if they don't like it they don't have the skills to change it---they simply try another prompt, and do that until they get something they like.
These people are calling themselves artists.
Not only that, these people are bringing the AI generated thing to interviews, and they are getting hired, leaving people who slave over their craft out of the job.
And that is the difference, for the tech bros who think AI art isn't a big deal.
GUYS what are X’s terms of use regarding art??? Do they also use your art for ai???
Okay maybe I can trust humanity a lil more
This machine kills AI
ATTENTION ALL MUSIC LOVERS!
There's a YouTube channel called Zauret Records. They put out "full albums" from whatever year (70s-80s) and under a fake artist's name, however, all the music is AI generated. Granted, they do admit it's fictional, but nowhere on the channel do they mention AI, so unless you go to their Instagram or Twitter, you will see no mention of AI. What's worse is they constantly pull in thousands of views. Please, whenever you find an artist/band, make sure you can find search results related to them from before 2023, or can in some other way verify that they are, in fact, human. Please reblog with any other YouTube channels or any kind of internet anything like Zauret Records so we all know who to stay away from.
AI disturbance overlays for those who don't have Ibis paint premium. found them on tiktok
AI disturbance overlays for those who don't have Ibis paint premium. found them on tiktok
Shooting myself.
Why is an AI going to art school and why did they have to name it Flynn. That's my name. I'm gatekeeping my name now. I'm not sharing. Why couldn't they spare us and let Elon give it some weird ass name instead of a human one. Why is an AI going to art school. Why is this a thing.
if I was a company that had any sort of posting functionality on my website I just wouldn't allow AI training at all ever
Reblogging again to say that disabled people can also make forms of art that isn't "traditional art". Music is art. Literature is art. Acting is art, dancing is art, even making food is art because you made something and it's yours, with your creativity. AI art is not art. It has no soul, no creativity, no life, no intention. AI will never be able to create a painting with emotion or words with true meaning. AI will never write a melody that reflects the deepest inner parts of itself because AI feels nothing. Disabled people are still people. Disabled people still feel, they love and cry and rage and scream, they smile and laugh. They have *imaginations*. At the end of the day it doesn't matter how functional the person's arms are, if they made it with intention and creativity, it is art. All people are capable of feeling, and all people are capable of expressing it, reguardless of skill level or physical ability.
Stating that an artist needs AI art to express their vision even if it is traditional art is, quite frankly, really dumb.
"ai is making it so everyone can make art" Everyone can make art dipshit it came free with your fucking humanity
it may take me a month to put out a chapter but at least im not using ai to write it.
it may take me a month to put out a chapter but at least im not using ai to write it.
it may take me a month to put out a chapter but at least im not using ai to write it.
it may take me a month to put out a chapter but at least im not using ai to write it.
it may take me a month to put out a chapter but at least im not using ai to write it.
IT MAY TAKE ME A MONTH TO PUT OUT A CHAPTER BUT AT LEAST IM NOT USING AI TO WRITE IT
I'm getting so much AI Squid Game art on my Twitter TL and it's actually making me so mad. Can we guys not? I don't care that you're using it for gay shit or you're using your own art DON'T FEED YOUR ART INTO A MACHINE THAT'S DESTROYING THE ENVIRONMENT LIKE WHAT
Write it shitty, write it scared, write it without a clue but don't you be so spineless and have an AI write fanfic for you.
New anti-AI tool from the team developing Glaze that looks to poison prompts and ruin data sets entirely.
The tool can go so far as to trick AI into generating things it didn't ask for. 50 "poisoned" images of dogs into a data set yield typical errors companies have been working to get rid of: weird proportions, extra limbs, etc. When they added 300 samples, it was drastic enough to make a data set that was trained to generate "dogs" into "cats" making the tool basically useless.
It's not out yet, but they're adding it to Glaze and they intend on making it open source.
Welcome to the age of the AI arms race.
"ai is making it so everyone can make art" Everyone can make art dipshit it came free with your fucking humanity
Ai art isn’t art just shit
Sonic approves
DOWN WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND UP WITH IMAGANATION
Guys do it, it's critical!
The option also appears on the app after the update.
And for my fellow artist, remember to nightshade and glaze your artwork! (This is the correct order)
remember to switch this on
^^^
I didn't have the option through mobile but if you go through your desktop settings, under visibility there is a toggle to switch so your work is not used in training AI, it's off by default (go figure lol)
AI disturbance overlays for those who don't have Ibis paint premium. found them on tiktok
AI disturbance overlays for those who don't have Ibis paint premium. found them on tiktok
Idk if my art is useful for ai but….
AI disturbance overlays for those who don't have Ibis paint premium. found them on tiktok
AI disturbance overlays for those who don't have Ibis paint premium. found them on tiktok
Id say give the ai generative 'art' software depression so it stops producing anything but all my best work was in a depressed fever dream and im afraid itll transcend to personhood if it grows emotions
i don't understand people who support ai art. ai art sucks. sure, it might look pretty to the untrained eye, but in truth it is soulless and blank. ai art is a robot pretending to understand emotions it will never comprehend. ai art is a stone pretending to breathe like it has any semblance of human lungs, of human flesh. ai art only brings suffering. ai is easy. ai is convenient. ai can bring you art in seconds that some artists will spend years trying to master. but art is not and HAS NEVER BEEN about instant gratification. art is about the process. every piece is a story. every artist has a journey they took to get there. that pride of a finished work, of an improvement made over months and years and decades, of the sheer capability to create, is not something that can ever be replaced with ai. and it's not just about drawing, but every creative industry there is. ai art gives the impression of an easy way out, but it does not know what it is doing. ai doesn't know at all. ai only stores. only steals. because artificial intelligence is exactly that: artificial. it is not able to create something as organic or as beautiful as a human being is. the intensity that can be felt from a painting, the emotion from a cartoon, the message conveyed in each and every stroke an artist makes and letter an author writes. is that not what makes us truly human? the desire may be crushed in some as life takes a different course, but it was always there. ai art only encourages people to give up. why put all the work in when this computer could do it for you in a fraction of the time and at no cost? because that's not the point!! it's about the process!!! art and music and poetry and design and writing and so many more things are all their own language, one that ai doesn't speak. because ai is an empty entity. even calling ai dead would be too much of a compliment, because it implies it has ever had a taste of living. ai art sucks. i don't understand people who support ai art.