I hate how people treat bisexual people (women especially) like we're just... sex receptacles, that have to put up with whatever in their sex partners want and who can't have any sexual boundaries. Bisexuals are still allowed to say no, to anyone, and anything, for any reason. No, we do not have to be your unicorns, we do not have to put up with "kinky" sex, and we can choose not to date men, even the one's who say they aren't men.
Free Palestinian women. Free Kurdish women. Free Afghan women. Free Syrian women. Free Sudanese women. Free Congolese women. Free Somali women. Free Yemeni women. Free Indigenous women. Free Rohingya women. Free Uyghur women. Free Haitian women.
None of us are free until all of us are.
If your feminism doesn't include Iranian and Afghan women, then you're not a feminist.
If your feminism doesn't include women suffering in highly patriarchial societies, then you're not a feminist.
If your feminism doesn't include honour killing victims, then you're not a feminist.
If your feminism doesn't include women suffering at the hands of a zealot religious ideology, then you're not a feminist.
If you support women who want to wear the hijab, but don't support women who don't want to wear it, then you're a morally corrupted person.
Current queerness activism is off its rocker and needs an entire overhaul. I couldn't figure it out from the beginning.
"Let them pee!" was pretty good, actually, I did fall for that one, an emotional appeal that people could relate to, but they just couldn't keep the lid on the AGPs hateposting their erections in the ladies rooms and getting their sex crimes splashed all over the internet, all the while insisting that it clearly had never happened and never would, and was paranoid pearl-clutching.
And No Debate? People said that like it was a normal thing to say in political debate, and not a huge red flag.
And using a word as loaded as genocide to describe stroke-of-the-pen lawmaking? Really ill-conceived.
Transphobiaaaaaaaaa! worked for awhile, until there was only one thing left that wasn't transphobic, which was lesbians having sex with men, and now does it mean anything? Other than 'you're not doing what you're told'?
Not just those language problems, either, the academics took the idea public that words about women don't really, on any meaningful level, define anything, and there's nothing about a woman that makes her a woman, and pointed at clownfish and shrugged smugly, like a reproductive capacity of a fish meant that women had been mistaken all along in believing we were women.
And then there was the shitshow of 'bonus hole' and 'non-men attracted to non-men'. That was an own goal. Now WPATH is chucking cis-supremacy around like that means a single thing.
The whole affair has been an utter shambles from start to finish. Just staggering from one PR disaster to another, constantly doubling down, and consistently revealing motives that look pretty indefensible, like begging for blockers and hormones for children, or they will harm themselves, while adult trans identities are valid just by saying so, and that women should participate in sports, contact and otherwise, with men, and be locked up in prison with them.
Queer Theory doesn't care about women, or know anything about women, just like Michael Foucault. It doesn't even respect women enough to answer our questions about seizing our rights.
Back to the drawing board, QT. Maybe get a talking gecko.
It is a deeply anti-female movement, it hates that women talk back, protect their kids, and analyze its ideas. So please keep doing all of that.
Baffling. Madness.
the word âwomanâ was bad to describe us, so people said âfemaleâ. the word âfemaleâ was bad so people said âafabâ. the word âafabâ is now bad too (âtalking about afab experiences is transmisogynisticâ), and you apparently shouldnât talk about the experiences of âpeople with vaginasâ only, either.Â
discussing âradical feminismâ was bad, so people said âfeminismâ, but that was bad, too, so people just talked about âmisogynyâ, but that was a âterfâ dogwhistle, so people talked about âgendered socializationâ but thatâs a transmisogynistic discussion framework, apparently. So where do you go next?
Itâs not that the words were offensive, itâs that the power they gave to women to exclusively discuss ourselves and our problems effectively and accurately was. Itâs a silencing tactic. We could call ourselves anything as a sex class and itâd still be offensive that we found solidarity. You canât talk about, find community with, or protect women if acknowledging sex is banned, and you canât talk about womenâs issues if acknowledging sexism is banned.Â
names like aidan, kai, lily, skye, jay, rory, xander, asher/ash, ethan, ophelia, etc.
uses neopronouns
pronouns.page or pronouns.cc linked
"male" in bio with a clearly female pfp or vice versa
terfs/radfems dni
onlyfans link
puppygirl / pup / catboy / catgirl
bimbo / whore / slut
ugly toothpaste flag plastered everywhere
women are just as violent as men
men don't rape more than women
(men on men rape is ignored by almost all libfems)
being "nonbinary" erases your birth sex
lesbians are attracted to men and penises
men can and should be lesbians
bi lesbians are real, labels are meaningless
all of the world's suffering is driven by terfs and jk rowling
women would be better off submitting
an all-nonbinary society is utopia
sex isn't real and intersex people are a secret magic third sex
women should stop being scared of men
lesbian relationships are inherently homophobic or toxic unless they include males
terrible world events wouldn't happen if aidan he/they/woof was in charge
feminists are stupid and aggressive
being a woman is not a positive thing
women's problems are lesser than men's
penises are beautiful and vagina is disgusting
transwomen are literally the exact same as biological women
attraction is pronouns based
porn is #empowering
watching porn is feminist and based
bdsm is the height of women's liberation
we should inject children with hrt
"bitch" and "cunt" are just normal words to describe women you don't like
can female celebrities keep dressing like this yearâs met gala all year? finally the majority of women are not naked and uncomfortable on the red carpet for once, letâs make it a trend
đđđđ
in fandom, "who's the top and who's the bottom" is heteronormativity to the highest degree. it is quite literally a progressive, "queer" way of asking "who's the man and who's the woman in the relationship?"
the top is always the more masculine one, big and strong, owning the bottom, doing the penetrating. the bottom is always the more feminine one, referred to as "wife," "princess," "babygirl," being owned by the top, being penetrated. and 9 times out of 10, this top/bottom bullshit is in reference to a M/M pairingâ you want a traditional heterosexual couple but you're so incredibly misogynistic you can't even bear the presence of a woman even if she is being degraded, so you make the "bottom" take her place.
i just saw this on twitter but i couldn't find the user of the OP. anyways, damn right
Yeah these people don't seem like transmisogynists to me or anything
some of yall need to understand that "my body, my choice" also applies to:
addicts in active addiction with no intention of quitting
phys disabled people who deny medical treatment
neurodivergent people who deny psychiatric treatment (yes, including schizophrenic people and people with personality disorders)
trans people who want or don't want to medically transition (yes, including trans masc lesbians with top surgery and trans women without bottom surgery, yall are so weird to them wtf)
and if you can't understand that, then you don't get to use the phrase
itâs not a male loneliness epidemic, itâs called natural selection, you fuckers
âb-but the birth rates are so lowâđ„șđđđ
thatâs literally textbook darwinism, if there are no viable partners (men), procreation drops.
itâs survival of the fittest and the weak die, cope!
i remember about a year ago during the stephen hawking/epstein situation I saw a tweet that said that people were joking about it because it was little girls getting raped, if it were little boys, it would be taken much more seriously.
I finally understand what she meant
the planet is desensitized to female sexual abuse, it happens everywhere after all, we are constantly exposed to it, it's woven into our subconscious, into our very existence, it is seen as something normal, natural, inevitable even
libfems and male apologists will try and tell you that male rape victims have it harder than female ones.
propaganda.
men getting raped has always been seen as more abhorrent, because it's seen as unnatural. with women, it's something inherent to their experience and dismissed as unremarkable
but when you see it happening to a man, you can see for yourself what it truly is; a brutal act of sadistic domination, you empathise with the victim, imagine their pain, imagine how humiliated they feel, when it's a woman, it's just a statistic. woman are constantly humiliated, business as usual.
The amount of women getting Botox is so.. sinister. Like weâre just admitting that as a society we donât think itâs attractive for women to be able to have facial expressions. To express emotion. To raise their eyebrows or wrinkle their noses or grin so big it changes their whole face. We donât want that in women. Everyone knows why. Itâs too human.
TRAs criticising a female author: CANCEL JKR I CAN'T BELIEVE I LOVED HARRY POTTER. I'M GETTING MY DEATHLY HALLOWS TATTOO REMOVED AND BURNING THE BOOKS I OWNED! FUCK ANYTHING MADE BY TRANSPHOBES!! ALSO THE PLOT WASN'T THAT GOOD AND THE CHARACTER NAMES ARE SHIT AND SHE'S A RACIST NAZI HOLOCAUST DENIER NAZI NAZI RACIST!!!
TRAs criticising a male author: ...well yeah Hussie wrote the r-word a few dozen times throughout homestuck and they also made Dave say the n-word once but it's ok because we should separate the art from the artist guys... Besides Dave is aracial anyway! Respect Hussie's pronouns please they're nonbinary đ„ș anyway here's an essay about why every character is trans uwu
i cannot put into words how sad i get when i see girls/women talking about wanting to get cosmetic surgery. there is nothing fucking wrong with having a face/body. why do you need to drop thousands to live up to a beauty standard? âomfg itâs her choice. yâall are feminists until it comes to what she chooses to do with surgeryâ. yes because why did she feel the need to make that choice? why canât we accept that plastic surgery is meant to feed off of womenâs insecurities?
i remember being told when i was about 12 and wanted to be a doctor âyou could be a plastic surgeonâ and immediately saying that i didnât wanna see women pay me to âfixâ them. i hate plastic surgery so bad. i know societal pressure is rough but itâs really not worth it :(
every time a GNC woman jumps ship and IDs as some category of ânot a womanâ it feels like sheâs thrown her hands up and said âFINE you were right, I was being a woman the wrong way and itâs because Iâm NOT oneâ but itâs celebrated as a victory rather than a crushing defeat for the rest of us who choose not to hide from our own reality. I get wanting to opt out of misogyny, but itâs just not possible...
"4b is misandrist" don't care "4b is unpatriotic" don't care "4b hurts men" don't care "4b will cause incels to rage out" don't care "4b is just purity culture" don't care "4b is problematic" don't care "4b is xyz-phobic or xyz-ist" don't care "4b is too radical" don't care "only ugly/unfuckable women do 4b" don't care "no one would want to sleep with you anyway" don't care "4b is bad for birthrates" don't care
The trouble with raising boys, see, is that if you don't tell him he's a special boy enough he'll become a serial killer. If you tell him that he is a special boy too much, however, he will also become a serial killer.
She's not "celebrating her sexuality" she's objectifying herself for the sake of male sexuality. Ask yourself, when straight male performers want to "celebrate their sexuality" on stage or in music videos, do they put on little booty shorts and a crop top? Do they cake their faces in makeup and shave their legs? No, they dress comfortably, and bring out women who are attractive to them dressed all degradingly. So I guess to answer your question, she can express her sexuality in a less male-gazey way by dressing comfortably, and letting the men parade around the stage half naked in degrading little outfits.
I don't know what makes me sadder; the bimbofication to become famous, or the fact that it worked.
Women: women are female human beings Ppl: that's bioessentialism terf Male freaks: I took E and all the womanly fee fees leaked out my tits and my brain is pink feminine liquid now and I don't understand mathematics :3 Ppl: yayy